Unusual payments
& financial activity
Examine duplicate entries, unexplained transfers, unusual timing, and transactions that fall outside expected patterns.
Unexplained transactions. Inconsistent records. Concerns that need more than a routine review.
AlgoBricks helps businesses examine financial irregularities, understand the available evidence, and identify practical next steps—with a structured, discreet approach.
Select a record to explore what a review might examine.
Compare invoice references, supplier details, dates, and amounts against the purchase records. An inconsistency prompts a question; it does not establish fraud.
Duplicate payments, unusual supplier activity, or missing approvals can arise from errors, weak processes, or deliberate misconduct. A useful review separates what is documented from what still needs to be established.
Start with a specific concern or a wider area of exposure. We agree the questions, records, and review boundaries before work begins.
Examine duplicate entries, unexplained transfers, unusual timing, and transactions that fall outside expected patterns.
Payments · Expenses · AdjustmentsReview supplier records, invoice patterns, changes to payment details, and the supporting purchase and approval trail.
Vendors · Invoices · ApprovalsBring fragmented records into a clearer chronology, reconcile available information, and identify gaps that affect the review.
Ledgers · Statements · TimelinesExplore inconsistencies between underlying transactions, accounting entries, and management reports within the agreed scope.
Entries · Balances · Supporting recordsAssess approval arrangements, access permissions, reconciliation practices, and other weaknesses that may create opportunities for misuse.
Access · Oversight · AccountabilityReceive a structured account of observations, supporting references, limitations, and recommendations for management consideration.
Define your review ↗The objective is to understand what the available information supports, where it conflicts, and what remains unresolved.
Clarify the concern, relevant period, authorised access, and expected deliverables.
Agree collection arrangements and organise supplied records with source references.
Compare transactions and explanations, investigate exceptions, and document gaps.
Present supported observations, review limitations, and recommended next steps.
Clear reporting keeps different types of information separate.
What the reviewed records show, with relevant references.
Missing information, conflicting explanations, and scope limitations.
Proportionate follow-up and opportunities to strengthen controls.
Data analysis can help surface exceptions across large transaction sets. Where appropriate and agreed, AI-assisted tools can support document review and pattern exploration.
A flagged transaction is a starting point. Its meaning still depends on supporting records, business context, and careful human review.
Discuss your records ↗Exceptions to examine.
Not findings of fraud.
Fees depend on record volume, data quality, the period under review, complexity, and the reporting required. Receive a scoped proposal before committing.
For a specific transaction, discrepancy, or clearly bounded concern.
For concerns spanning multiple transactions, records, or business processes.
For businesses seeking periodic exception reviews and stronger oversight.
| Engagement detail | Focused Review | Forensic Review | Controls & Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Examine a defined concern | Explore connected irregularities | Strengthen ongoing oversight |
| Coverage | Agreed issue and records | Agreed processes and periods | Selected recurring checks |
| Main output | Review summary | Structured findings report | Periodic observations and actions |
| Timing | Defined engagement | Milestone-based engagement | Agreed recurring schedule |
Final deliverables are set out in the engagement agreement. Legal advice, device forensics, expert testimony, and asset recovery are not included unless separately assessed and expressly agreed.
Not sure how to describe the concern? Start with a short, general outline. We can discuss what a suitable review would involve.
Ask about your situation ↗No. You can contact us about an unexplained discrepancy or concern. An initial discussion helps define the issue and assess whether our services are suitable. A concern alone is not evidence of misconduct.
A forensic review typically examines specific concerns or irregularities through detailed financial and document analysis. An internal audit generally assesses controls, risk management, and processes against an agreed scope. The right approach depends on your objective.
No. Findings depend on the scope, records available, access granted, and quality of the information. We explain relevant limitations and distinguish supported observations from unresolved questions.
Depending on the concern, relevant material may include ledgers, bank statements, invoices, purchase orders, approval records, and transaction exports. We agree what is needed and how it should be shared before collection.
Confidentiality terms, authorised contacts, access arrangements, and appropriate transfer methods should be agreed before sensitive records are shared. Please use the enquiry form only for a general outline, without naming individuals or including account details.
That cannot be assumed. Intended use, jurisdiction, evidence requirements, and any specialist qualifications must be assessed before the engagement. If proceedings are anticipated, involve your legal adviser when defining the work.
Where appropriate, we can agree a coordinated scope with your authorised advisers. Responsibilities, information sharing, and reporting arrangements are clarified at the outset.
Both depend on complexity, record volume, data quality, and the depth of analysis required. Following an initial scoping discussion, we propose deliverables, milestones, and fees. Any material changes to scope should be agreed before additional work.
Tell us, in general terms, what needs a closer look. We’ll discuss whether we can help and what an appropriate engagement could involve.